99 Percent Is a Failing Grade
Ten steps at 90 percent complete 35 percent of the time. Chained reliability is arithmetic, and the strongest lever is a deterministic step that never degrades it.
ReadThoughts · Agentic TOM
Essays on agentic AI, operating model transformation, and the structural shifts arriving faster than most institutions assume.
New here?
Three layers of workforce, escalation designed in, outcomes owned end-to-end.
When every client sends an agent, volume multiplies and revenue does not.
What the few companies with a measurable EBIT effect do differently.
By theme
What an agentic operating model is, and who manages the agents.
How decisions return to humans, and how autonomy is earned.
What happens when clients send agents.
The model applied to lending, compliance, software quality and the core.
All essays, newest first
Ten steps at 90 percent complete 35 percent of the time. Chained reliability is arithmetic, and the strongest lever is a deterministic step that never degrades it.
ReadMcKinsey puts the share of companies with a significant EBIT effect from AI at six percent. Three habits separate them: breadth, iteration, the discipline to stop.
ReadTime from disclosure to exploitation fell from 2.3 years to three hours. Testing is the next function that must become agentic. In a bank, it is a control.
ReadMROS receives 84 suspicious activity reports a working day, four times the 2020 volume. Compliance is the first function where the case for agents is arithmetic.
ReadClients rarely complain because the effort exceeds the payoff. AI agents remove the friction: every suitability gap surfaced as a structured complaint.
ReadAI agents give every client the information position of an institution. When fees can be benchmarked in real time, margins compress from the demand side.
ReadThe family office model was always gated by wealth. AI agents remove the gate. What happens to wealth management when every client gets institutional attention?
ReadCalling a model is a commodity. Closing the loop into the core banking system, with audit and control intact, is where the real work sits.
ReadEvery bank COO has a planning horizon of 18 to 36 months. The day Anthropic released Claude Managed Agents, that horizon got shorter.
ReadWho is responsible for a workforce that is not human? Neither IT nor HR can own it alone. It is a design decision most banks have not yet made.
ReadBanking autonomy arrives in levels, each earned with evidence. Most institutions sit between Level 1 and 2, mistaking early automation for readiness.
ReadMortgage origination redesigned across bots, agents and humans, grounded in what FINMA actually requires. Same rules, different cost structure, different speed.
ReadWhen every mortgage seeker sends an AI agent, inbound volume multiplies tenfold and revenue does not. The shift that hits first comes from outside the bank.
ReadEvery bank deploying AI agents has skipped the most basic step in workforce management: defining what the agent is actually hired to do.
ReadThe failure mode of most automation projects is not that machines make wrong decisions. It is that nobody designed when and how the decision returns to a human.
ReadFINMA's principles-based framework, data sovereignty and relationship banking give Swiss institutions a structural position to lead agentic deployment.
ReadMost AI discussions in banking pick tools. The consequential question is how the organisation itself must change to absorb what the tools make possible.
ReadStay in touch
Questions, disagreement, or a case from your institution: find Marc on LinkedIn. New essays also appear in the RSS feed.